Between Niche and Noise: How Anora and EEAAO Redraw the Indie-Mainstream Line

In recent years, a curious shift has taken place in American cinema: independent films such as Anora and Everything Everywhere All at Once (abbreviated EEAAO), which feature primarily female protagonists representing complex minority groups,have broken through cultural and commercial expectations. Or, rather, they have exceeded both, an action already breaking conventions on its own. Michael Z. Newman, author of Indie: An American Culture, observes that indies often challenge mainstream values and aesthetics, offering originality and carrying a definitive spirit of resistance. Yet what feels most striking is how today, that same resistance is being met with not only critical acclaim from festivals and reviewers, but also audience enthusiasm and box office success—indeed, certain indie films now mirror the image of blockbusters. These include action scenes, heroic protagonists, and substantial marketing. This shift points to something larger: the audience’s growing hunger for original, emotionally and psychologically nuanced stories that feature diverse representations that move beyond the dominant gaze. 

Critical and Cultural Value of Diverse Representation

As pointed out by critics, magazines, and even mental health researchers, Anora and EEAAO portray formerly underrepresented emotional lives in American society. These diverse emotional lives are manifested in the films via original narratives different from blockbuster formulas. Han, Crystal et al. in the Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry observe  EEAAO’s refreshing portrayal of Asian American LGBTQ communities and their struggles with issues such as intergenerational trauma and distancing related to their intersectional identities. David Bloom notes that this representation had widespread resonance among the Asian American community, manifested (or demonstrated) not only in a surge in box office returns but also in these films competitiveness for film awards, especially the Academy Awards, where the portrayal of a minority with an uplifting ending was the perfect match for Best Pictures.

Anora, on the other hand, represents an unexpected combination of the sex worker community with the Russian American community of Brighton Beach, NY. Fernando Espi Forcen points out that the film’s anti-American dream depiction of a minority figure’s anxiety and struggles with social inequality makes a stark distinction between Anora and more traditional films that rely upon romance and class struggle tropes. Nate Jones, writing in Vulture, further analyzes Anora’s critical success: initially dismissed by Oscar voters as “risqué” and unlikely to win Best Picture, Anora’s unanticipated triumph proves further that unconventional narratives with complex and nuanced protagonists can now occupy space traditionally held by Hollywood juggernauts. The Academy’s shifting attitude is another reflection of the change in cultural values that the Oscars are trying to assert, or perhaps even to adapt to.

Financial and Popular Success

As pointed out by Newman, a major supporter and circuit platform for independent film is the thriving community of film festivals all around the world: it energizes commerce for the films while preventing it from being “tainted” by the mass public. Yet the emerging “blockbuster” films evidently received aid from the so-called mass public. As examined by marketing analyst Coco Mocoe, Anora grossed $56.3 million worldwide against a $6 million film budget. Mocoe predicted the film would become a “sleeper hit” in her podcast in March 2025, pointing out at that time that it remained number one on streaming for Apple TV and Amazon Prime. EEAAO, on the other hand, grossed a whopping $107 million worldwide according to Forbes, acting as an uplifting message for the indie industry still recovering from the blow of the pandemic. The two films financial successes were largely due to substantial marketing and award campaigning, as pointed out by both Mocoe and Bloom; Mocoe even goes so far as to assert that Anora’s popularity was simply a result of it “not trying to be popular”, while a No Film School article argues that it is the “small ideas” that have the potential to make big breaks (No Film School).

Distribution Challenges and Streaming Debates

In light of the rapidly changing film-viewing environment, discourse has also developed around the prospective future of indie films, focusing specifically on streaming platforms’ effects on indie distribution. Ted Mundorff warns in Hollywood Reporter that streaming sidelines indie cinema, causing the indies made for the big screen to become increasingly inaccessible to the public and ultimately killing their chances to be seen in theaters—their only hope to increase screenings anywhere at all (Mundorff). In contrast, Elliot Grove, the founder of the Raindance Film Festival, notes how platforms may enable greater audience access to under-the-radar films that may have a shot at a longer-living viewing span (Grove).

While the sources explored above have identified patterns of recent indie success and shifting audience values, a holistic academic examination is still lacking. An inquiry into how these films disrupt industry norms and redefine commercial viability would lead to a greater understanding of  America’s current indie panorama and potential future. This growing field of minority-focused indie cinema deserves systematic study, not just festival buzz or journalistic snapshots.

Historically, indie cinema has always been viewed as the opposition to Hollywood superpowers: they are the rebels, the non-conformists, the originals. As described by Newman, indies have been seen “as an implicit (or explicit) assault on the conventions of the studio film, the mainstream movie, and the institutions through which it is experienced—or at least as an effort to provide a needed counterbalance and response to it.” Indeed, from the explorations of formalism and realism in the late 1910s to experimental cinema after World War II, indies have presented themselves to be adventurous, original narratives “outside of mainstream film exhibition.” Within the last decade, however, new speculation has emerged about viewing indie films not as an opposition to mainstream cinema, but rather, as King puts it,  as an “alternative narrative mode,” pointing out that differences between indies and large studio work “tend to be relative and variable rather than absolute.” Further building upon this argument is the suggestion that rather than opposing mainstream cinema, indie films tend to oppose mainstream society and its dominating, overpowering voices, which in turn are carried through mainstream narratives. As Newman puts it, “Films that self-consciously flaunt an oppositional aesthetics are somewhat rare in American independent cinema. More often, however, the themes of indie films are in some sense critical of mainstream society, which can figure as the stand-in for the dominant media industry whose audience is that social mainstream.”

Although switching from “anti-Hollywood” to “anti-mainstream society,” one thing remains clear in both Newman and King’s definition, and the general definition of indie—that the true indies should be to the farthest extent free from commercialization constraints and mass appeals; should be financially and spiritually autonomous and in firm opposition to industrialization. According to Newman, there is an elite exclusivity to the indie community that needs to be nurtured by the careful avoidance of mass popularity, as he states in his book:

In classifying a film with too much marketing behind it—one pursuing and attaining too much commercial success, with too much mass appeal and mainstream media attention—as inauthentically indie, the culture of indie cinema reasserts the hierarchy of autonomous expressive creativity over commercialism. It makes clear that its own identity is characterized by opposition to corporate and mainstream values.

Likewise, King asserts that the quality of indie films and the amount in the market correlates directly with gross outcomes—overproduction, although a sign of good commerce, may not be beneficial for the films themselves. As King quotes Amir Malin, “ ‘With the amount of quality films in the marketplace, there’s no question that we are all cannibalising each other’s potential gross.’” Evidently, too many good indies isn’t ideal, either. The American indie seems to be a delicate entity, preferably free of “the taint of the mass audience” and commerce. This paper will thus explore how recent breaking successes of indie films stretch the boundaries of such definitions.

Another recent change has been the post-pandemic shift in mass audience desires for movies. Long periods of isolation, loss, and trauma in the country resulted in a collective hunger for emotionally meaningful, diverse narratives different from the familiar and predictable movie franchises that raced to reemerge as soon as the pandemic ended. This is evident in the Barbenheimer phenomenon, where the “event film”—people flocking to the movie theater largely for movie-themed gatherings—not only directly led to high box-office grosses of both films but also revived the theatrical run amidst the public’s growing reliance on streaming platforms. Radner in his opinion piece says that nowadays “what the film industry terms ‘pre-awareness,’ enhanced through marketing, online presence and, in particular, social media attention, is a prerequisite for a successful movie.” Barbie, however, did the most part in establishing the viral bright pink aesthetics upon which this “film event” is based. Coupled with its feminist concepts, this original IP was able to provide the emotional boost and social gathering that people missed—it felt like an occasion, not a sequel—thus doing a much better job than movies like the most recent Despicable Me film. The box office grosses of the two films are $1.4 billion versus $970 million. 

In this light, recent films have emerged with both critical acclaim from world-class festivals and financial success relative to their modest budgets. In addition, these indie films generate large-scale audience excitement not in spite of being independent, but because of how they challenge the boundaries of what independent cinema can achieve. Incorporating blockbuster strategies, they tell emotionally specific and culturally diverse stories that redefine audience expectations and expand cultural influence. Though grounded in unique cultural and psychological identities, they speak to universal experiences of loss, connection, and transformation, allowing their messages to transcend genre, culture, and market category.

This paper calls these films “indie blockbusters” and argues that independent cinema—once largely positioned as an alternative to the mainstream—is increasingly becoming a mainstream vessel for underrepresented narratives in American film. Using Anora and Everything Everywhere All At Once as case studies, this paper analyzes each film’s textual message, industrial practices, and audience reception to examine how this shift is taking place.

Textual Message

As mentioned above, these indie blockbusters exhibit both unique features of independent cinema and techniques used by studios to produce massive hits. These parallels include genre choice, emotional narrative arcs, and editing.

To start off, EEAAO blends two exciting genres—the multiverse and the action movie—making it seem almost like an Asian version of Dr. Strange or the newest Spiderman movie but with Chinese martial arts. The protagonist Evelyn experiences a million different versions of herself, including those where she is a Chinese kungfu master. Evelyn’s stunt choreography, the flamboyant utilization of surrounding objects in fight scenes, and the slo-mos are all direct tributes to movies such as The Matrix, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, and the numerous Jackie Chan movies. The reference to older movies is not only a smart move to ensure the high level of visual stimulation in its fight scenes—you cannot go wrong with following the tactics of these classics—but paying tribute to classics alone is something blockbusters have always loved to do. It also did it the right way. Compared to Fall Guy, an intended blockbuster with a $85 million domestic box office flop, EEAAO chose to refer to classic movies that are still well remembered and loved by movie-goers to this day.

In addition, much like many superhero movies, heroine Evelyn is coupled by a romantic sideline. Her husband Waymond, a seemingly cowardly middle-aged Cantonese man who secretly wants to divorce Evelyne, transforms magically into a heroic mastermind of multiverse-jumping who arms Evelyn with all she needs to fight her monstrous daughter. The fact that both versions of Waymond coexist provides the perfect hero’s dilemma in romance: can Evelyn fall in love with her husband’s alter ego? In the end, mastermind Waymond saves Evelyn from this dilemma by epically sacrificing his life—another classic trope in the hero’s journey that adds to the emotional arc of the film. 

Simultaneously, Anora follows a character-driven romance/crime arc that feels adventurous in scope. Ani, the “hooker with a heart of gold,” meets the seemingly perfect man of her life—the Russian version of a Prince Charming who can potentially transform her from a sex worker to a “princess”. The falling-in-love process is rapid and romantic: a visually and auditorily robust montage of the couple partying, making, love, and using substances, all leading up to Vanya’s impulsive and dreamlike wedding proposal in Las Vegas. The romance reaches a climax when Ani and Vanya kiss each other in front of the makeshift wedding backdrop with a friend’s camera flashing in the couple’s faces. As the music swells, the scene transitions to the couple twirling each other on the neon-lit plaza, their smiles huge on their faces as they continue to kiss. The huge “STAGE” sign in the background combined with the previous camera-flashing creates an illusional, theatrical atmosphere to the whole scene, making everything seem even more dramatic and emotionally heightened than it already is. Ani and Vanya truly seem like the modern and slightly illegal version of Cinderella. 

Coupled with the classic romantic arc is the unhinged “criminal” arc of the film. As the thugs of Vanya’s billionaire father barge into the mansion and attempt to capture the couple, Anora quickly spirals into an amusingly chaotic action-mystery. Ani’s seemingly unblocked, realistic, and loud resistance against Igor’s cautious approach is both visually arresting and comedic. The occasional cut-to-action editing highlights Ani’s unexpected brutality when facing off two grown men, such as when she kicks Garnik right in the nose even with her upper body tied down. In addition, the extreme close-ups to Ani’s screaming mouth amplifies the visual impact of her defiance, making her the major propellor of the fight and the entire plot—this film, much like many blockbusters, is largely character-driven.

Throughout the film, Ani is not the damsel in distress dragged along to look for her escaped husband. Rather, she is a verbally and physically fierce woman who actively seeks out Vanya and attempts to fight almost everyone she encounters. Extreme mouth close-ups, full-frame portrayals of her destructive behavior, and her determination to get revenge on the thugs firmly establish Ani’s role of driving the plot forward. The dramatic irony of Ani’s false belief that Vanya “is going to get help” may seem ridiculous and comedic to the viewer, yet it simultaneously accentuates her strong will, increasing her character drive and the narrative appeal of the film. 

Although incorporating certain blockbuster elements, these films managed to maintain their independent identity in the sense that they, in Norman’s words, remain “critical of mainstream society” and elicit the voices of overlooked and oppressed communities. Interestingly, however, this quality is also how indie blockbusters are thematically refreshing yet widely received: through highly specific contexts and emotional journeys, they elicit universal experiences—connection, regret, identity, loss—that speak to us all.

EEAAO tackles with topics such as queerness in the Asian American community, immigration chaos, and intergenerational trauma that all result in the essential conflict of the film: familial distancing, mental health issues, and more specifically, AFD (acculturative family distancing) defined as “... the problematic distancing that occurs between immigrant parents and children that is a consequence of differences in acculturative processes and cultural changes.” Both the causes and effects along the plotline are themes that are culturally specific and emotionally unique to the Asian American community, as well as something that has barely been directly addressed in American cinema. As pointed out by Han et al., “at the heart of EEAAO is a queer daughter on the verge of psychic suicide jumping through universes, searching for a version of her mother who understands her.” The film portrays a profoundly realistic, typical, and specific reaction of traditional Asian families when the  children try to express who they are. Instead of emotional outbursts, either in acceptance or outrage, Asian parents take the approach of soft denial, either actively ignoring their children’s coming out or convinced that their children were simply confused and that queerness does not exist. This combination of denial and blame is represented perfectly in Evelyn’s reaction to seeing Jobu Tupaki for the first time: “You’re the reason my daughter doesn’t call anymore. Why she dropped out of college and got tattoos. You are why she thinks she is gay.” The result of this suppression and clash between ideals is also quite unique: Asian American children, most commonly second generation immigrants, crumbling under pressure and into depression, nihilism, and suicide; exactly what Jobu states to her mother Evelyn: “If nothing matters, then all the pain and guilt you feel for making nothing of your life…it goes away.” In addition, the film’s maximalist editing creates an overwhelming sense reflective of all the chaos that occurs in Evelyn’s life. The film itself is a view of Evelyn’s mentality and the complex and interwoven issues that Asian American families may face.

Anora, on the other hand, sheds light on the Russian-Armenian community in the US while confronting the lives of American sex workers. When these two communities meet in an unlikely story, the audience is able to see just how unrealistic the American Dream can be, and how different minority groups—all working towards the dream—eventually end up as the victims of the social system of money and power. The film achieves representation by fully portraying each character’s struggles in an objective way: the Armenian thugs of Vanya’s family are often caught up between the pressure of the billionaire parents and Ani’s chaotic cat chase to find Vanya, which is further accentuated through their switches between the Russian and Armenian languages; the hired Russian helper Igor remains quiet and obedient throughout the story, but stands up for Ani in the end as he sees his own struggles in hers—in the final scene, they provide each other comfort and support, finding a mutual understanding. Within this harsh reality, Ani’s illusion of the possibility of a brand new, perfect life free from her past identities becomes increasingly tempting yet tragic. Her emotional drive is one uniquely fueled by reckless love, false hope, vengeance on whoever is sabotaging her marriage, and the profound fear of falling back into the life she used to live. The same emotional drive is the propellor of the story, thus making Anora a deeply personal and realistic recount of the girl’s inner struggles and growth. When the audience resonates with the common emotion of helplessness and indignation in these circumstances, the film succeeds in bringing out the humanity and savvy of these minority groups. Another way that Anora challenges mainstream society is its direct mockery of the wealthy and privileged represented by Vanya and his ridiculously rich family. Although disguised as an often-told “hooker with a heart of gold” story, the “prince” in Anora turns out to be a coward—an impulsive boy who indulges in drugs and sex and holds no accountability for his actions. Vanya’s overly arrogant and protective mother spoils him into an adult with a child’s mind, and when out of rage and humility, Ani says to her that “Your son hates you so much he marries [a hooker] to piss you off,” (1:58:46) the father, who has not said a single word in the film, starts laughing uncontrollably—completely giving up on the absurd state of his family. Evidently, money does not solve all the problems.

Industrial Shifts

While these indie blockbusters achieve content uniqueness through their original mixture of blockbuster genres and specific representations, their industrial practices are even more crucial to dissecting the reasons for their overall success. If the indie world is once defined by its detachment from commercial logic, the profit, marketing, and campaigning of Anora and EEAAO complicates these boundaries. Rather than relying solely on massive budgets and franchise branding like blockbusters to profit, or on pure festival campaigns to appeal to the older generation of film critics, studios like A24 and Neon and even festivals themselves become champions of the films, conducting strategic routes to major festival wins and helping their films become economically robust—even successful—on the scale of mainstream cinema.

To begin with, while EEAAO has grossed over $142 million against its production budget of $25 million—almost a 5.7/1 scale, Anora has collected a worldwide box office gross of over $57 million against its $6 million production budget— a scale of 9.5/1. While the box office numbers alone may not compete with current blockbusters, the proportions by which their grosses had sprung up from the budgets easily exceed most of the hits in cinema, such as How to Train Your Dragon, the newest Mission Impossible, Captain America, and Thunderbolts, each reaching box offices of hundreds of millions yet, as a recently released Variety article points out, are also produced with ridiculously high budgets that stop them from attaining high profit. These are not just successes for indie films—they prove that films with unconventional protagonists and tonal risks can thrive commercially.  

The backbone of these indies’ financial success, as always, is festival and critical acclaim. As Newman points out, “Festivals have a complicated relationship to the marketplace, both stimulating commerce in films and avoiding the taint of the mass audience whose attention guarantees successful films a commercial windfall.” Yet in recent years, as the public’s eye is increasingly turning towards worldwide festivals and critical opinion, the results of festivals are asserting influence on audiences more than the niche cinephiles—award-winning indies are being pushed towards the “mass audience” that Newman describes, and not necessarily tainting the films. 

A similar festival-to-commercial arc defines Everything Everywhere All At Once, which shows how festivals now work more as industrial launchpads than just artistic showcases. The film premiered at South By Southwest (abbreviated SXSW)—a festival known more for innovation than prestige—and immediately gained festival campaign support from the festival itself, with programmers referring to EEAAO as “the best film ever.”  This early triumph and support prepared the film for a theatrical run that eventually transformed it into a frontrunner for the Academy Awards. As noted by a senior Variety awards editor, “If arthouse theaters are minimal now, then film festivals may be one of the last main stops for an adult drama or an indie project to get some eyeballs on it.” For EEAAO, SXSW wasn’t a quirky detour, but a calculated entry point into a new pipeline: festival buzz to award traction to mass-market embrace. Its genre-blending chaos didn’t hinder its reception; instead, the credibility of its festival premiere helped it build the kind of word-of-mouth most needed in a collapsing post-pandemic arthouse market. That the film remained in theaters for months after its debut, much longer than most indie theatrical windows, speaks to just how important festival legitimacy has become for films that want to break past niche boundaries and connect with larger, more global audiences.

Likewise, Anora’s commercial rise was no accident, but the result of a carefully designed festival campaign aimed to position the film as both artistically credible and broadly appealing. The film’s Palme d’Or win kicked off its marathon for the Oscars early on: as observed by critics, “As the Academy has grown ever more international, it is now the Cannes crowd who set the tone for the subsequent Oscar season.” Anora has nailed both the timing and the outcome, setting itself as an official contender for the Oscars and not something portrayed as overly niche or unserious. In Jones's words, “If you can play on the Croisette, you'll play with voters.” Additionally, the voters community had had time to get accustomed to the director Sean Baker’s auteurist style with his past films. With Tangerine, The Florida Project, and Red Rocket as fame-building predecessors, Anora’s consistency with the Baker-style combined with its relatively more digestible romance structure serves as Baker’s best potential shot for the larger festivals. 

The director and star’s appearances in front of the festival public were also well planned and received. According to Jones, Mikey Madison emerges as “an enthusiastic young cinephile who was an ambassador from the Letterboxd Generation,” running a “successful ingénue campaign” similar to that of Jennifer Lawerence’s in the 2010s. With her resemblance of young actresses in the older festival days and representation of the new film generation, Madison appeals to younger and older film critics alike and sets herself ready for Best Leading Actress. Baker, on the other hand, positions himself as the “steward” of the indie auteurist art form rather than a “revolutionary.” His call for the return of longer theatrical windows fights for the director’s rightful pursuits of theatrical artistry and presents himself as a dignified filmmaker full of noble beliefs and potential. 

In the end, both EEAAO and Anora’s fruitful yield of awards is not only a reflection of the cleverness of the team’s festival campaign, but yet another testament to the Oscars’ growing tendencies for indie films over the recent years— “gritty, scrappy movies” with endnotes that are “hard to pin down - and equally hard to shake” are increasingly becoming favorites of audiences—and the Academy’s. In the words of an Oscar strategist: much like EEAAO, Anora is a “feel-good movie. You come out of it feeling hopeful about humanity.” Unsurprisingly, the awards paid off: according to IMDb Pro, in the two weeks from February 28th to March 13th, Anora saw a whopping 517.0% increase in domestic box office revenue. EEAAO’s record-breaking revenue and critical acclaim prompted film community media and critics to speak optimistically of the future of independent cinema; while the larger film community viewed it as a signal light—of either threat or potential—much of the indie community saw it as a beacon of hope.

Audience Reception

The audience loves films that aren’t trying to be popular. Instead, staying authentic to their niche, digging deeper, not wider might attract more attention. While some films strive for mass appeal, EEAAO and Anora suggest that audiences are increasingly drawn to works that remain authentic to their niche. In fact, full support from a small, committed audience often proves more impactful than lukewarm interest from a broader one. That loyalty creates a kind of cultural scarcity: the larger public begins to feel they are missing out on something intense and meaningful.

Anora’s early screenings provide a clear example of this dynamic. At its first Hollywood showings, the theaters were filled not with traditional Oscar voters but with a mix of publicists and strippers. In one now-viral moment, actress Mikey Madison entered the theater as the film ended and was met with a heel-clicking ovation from a crowd of strippers. Filmed on a phone from the back of the theater, the clip exploded across social media. People flooded to the theater, eager to witness the mysterious film that sparked such an unusual scene. The authenticity of the moment turned the film into a cultural conversation, simultaneously giving visibility to a marginalized group rarely centered in such spaces.

In the case of EEAAO, the audience effect was more gradual, but no less powerful. The movie itself was moving enough that many left the theater with an emotional intensity strong enough to compel recommendations. According to PostTrak, 46% of the film’s audience early in its run attended based on personal referrals. Quoting a GQ article analyzing EEAAO’s success, “While blockbusters live or die on their opening weekend returns, word of mouth can help sustain an arthouse hit.”For EEAAO, the theatrical run was sustained for months—long past the typical lifespan of indie releases. This allowed the film to grow into an unlikely Oscar juggernaut, which in turn extended its audience reach further.

Even the film’s visual style contributed to its viral longevity. Its rapid-fire editing, and absurdist humor mirrored the pacing and aesthetics of popular TikTok content. Internet users mimicked the multiverse concept in short videos, imagining alternate versions of themselves or splicing their lives into surreal timelines. What might have been perceived as a barrier to older audiences instead became a gateway for younger viewers to engage—and share.

Together, these films demonstrate that audience reception no longer hinges on large-scale, culturally mainstream relativity, but on emotional resonance within small, active communities. A film’s authenticity invites loyalty. That loyalty creates virality. Virality, in turn, becomes one of the most reliable engines for long-term success.

When the mass audience becomes attuned to, even deeply curious of, culturally and psychologically underrepresented narratives, the question is then how they would ultimately absorb such seemingly unrelatable stories and emotions. How do these “indie blockbusters” convey emotional resonance and relatability—crucial keys to a successful film—through niche stories? The answer: They tell stories of people specific to minor communities—but of a shared humanity. As New York magazine film critic Alison Willmore says about EEAAO, 

Part of the appeal of the film is that it is about Asian American characters without being marketed as an Asian American film — its characters simply are, and just as relatable in all their cultural and personal specifics as anyone else.The more granular and accurate the details, the more real and relatable a film can seem, even to viewers without a shared cultural experience.

As for Anora, it is “a film that shows us the complexities of human nature, the unresolvable tension between fantasy and reality, and the ways in which we all confront the challenges of society’s inequalities.” When stories are authentically, truthfully told, universal connections emerge from the realistic details. 

Taken together, Anora and Everything Everywhere All at Once show that the future of American cinema may not depend on choosing between independence and popularity, but rather on building a space where both can thrive. Their success does not come from rejecting the mainstream, or from unanimously embracing it, but from finding a way to stay irreplaceably unique while being structurally smart. These “indie blockbusters” remain true to their core—Sean Baker’s comedial objectiveness and the Daniels’ experimental extravaganza—while developing a system that allows them to maneuver: through early festival buzz, smart release strategies, and careful attention to who’s watching.

At a time when the theatrical landscape feels more fragile than ever, these films prove that staying personal doesn’t mean staying unknown. By holding onto their niche voices and trusting smaller, passionate communities to carry the work forward, they turned what could’ve been limitations into real momentum. And in doing so, Anora and EEAAO don’t just survive in today’s market. They are a part of the map being redrawn. Would this lead to a new form of formulaic “indie blockbuster” system, or will pushing the dimensions of either film type dilute the essence of both? Perhaps it is still too soon to tell. For now, ending on a quote from a Harvard Crimson article, 

It was a welcome burst of creativity and otherworldliness in a time when people were looking for a way to disconnect from the stillness of a post-pandemic world. Audiences loved the film for its experience, its insanity, its beauty, and its love.

[It] is changing the [film] landscape for the better, and audiences need to strap in and get excited.

Bibliography

Anora. Directed by Sean Baker. FilmNation Entertainment, 2024.

Bart, Peter. "H'wood Combats Franchise Fatigue." Variety, 2011, 2. http://ezproxy.oberlin.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/magazines/hwood-combats-franchise-fatigue/docview/860332055/se-2?accountid=12933.

Bloom, David. "Oscar Wins from 'Everything Everywhere All at Once' Won't Fuel Smaller Movies." Forbes, March 14, 23. Accessed June 18, 2025. https://www.forbes.com/sites/dbloom/2023/03/14/everything-everywhere-won-nearly-everything-at-oscars-but-whats-next-for-smaller-movies/.

Crow, David. "Everything Everywhere All At Once and the Film Festivals That Pave the Way to Oscar Gold." Den of Geek, March 10, 2023. Accessed July 20, 2025. https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/everything-everywhere-all-at-once-film-festivals-oscars/.

Everything Everywhere All At Once. Directed by Daniel Scheinert and Daniel Kwan. A24, 2022.

Forcen, Fernando Espi. "'Anora' Explores Our Anxiety regarding Social Struggles." Psychiatric News, April 10, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2025.05.5.33.

Gause, Najya. "Why We Loved 'Everything Everywhere All At Once.'" The Harvard Crimson, April 4, 2023. Accessed July 20, 2025. https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2023/4/4/everything-everywhere-all-at-once-oscars-best-picture/#:~:text=It%20was%20a%20welcome%20burst,strap%20in%20and%20get%20excited.

Grove, Elliot. "Beyond the Lens: The Future for Independent Filmmakers." Editorial. Raindance. Last modified September 22, 2024. Accessed June 18, 2025. https://raindance.org/beyond-the-lens-the-future-for-independent-filmmakers/.

Han, Crystal, Shinnyi Chou, Elaine Shen, Scott M. Lee, Vicky Wang, and Steve Sust. "Everything Everywhere All at Once." Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 63, no. 2 (2024): 286-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2023.10.011.

Hellerman, Jason. "How 'Anora' Won Best Picture and Shocked Us All." No Film School, March 3, 2025. Accessed July 20, 2025. https://nofilmschool.com/how-anora-won-best-picture.

Hwang, Wei-Chin. "Acculturative Family Distancing: Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice." Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 43, no. 4 (2006): 397-409. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.43.4.397.

IMDbPro. Everything Everywhere All At Once. Box Office Mojo. Accessed July 20, 2025. https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt6710474/?ref_=bo_se_r_1.

Jones, Nate. "Why the Oscars Put a Ring on Anora." Vulture, March 3, 2025. Accessed July 20, 2025. https://www.vulture.com/article/why-anora-won-best-picture-at-the-2025-oscars.html.

King, Geoff, Claire Molloy, and Yannis Tzioumakis. American Independent Cinema : Indie, Indiewood and beyond. Routledge, 2013. Digital file.

Lang, Brent, and Rebecca Rubin. "Box Office 2025 Takeaways: PG Movies Score, Superheroes Remain Shaky and Budgets Are Just Too High." Variety, July 8, 2025. Accessed July 20, 2025. https://variety.com/2025/film/features/box-office-takeaways-superhero-movies-suffer-1236448571/.

Mitchell, Audrey, Anna Backman Rogers, Erin Harrington, et al. "Barbenheimer." Australasian Journal of American Studies 43, no. 1 (2024): 119-50. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48787093.

Mocoe, Coco. "The Brilliant Branding of Anora." March 10, 2025. In Ahead of the Curve with Coco Mocoe. Podcast, audio. Accessed July 20, 2025. https://cocomocoe.substack.com/p/the-brilliant-branding-of-anora.

Mundorff, Ted. "Hollywood's Big Streaming Pivot Will Be Costly for Indie Films." The Hollywood Reporter, December 18, 2020. Accessed July 20, 2025. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/hollywoods-big-streaming-pivot-will-be-costly-for-indie-films-guest-column-4105503/.

Newman, Michael Z. Indie : an American Film Culture. Columbia University Press, 2011. Digital file.

Phipps, Keith. "How Everything Everywhere All At Once Became a Juggernaut." GQ, May 20, 2022. Accessed July 20, 2025. https://www.gq.com/story/how-everything-everywhere-all-at-once-became-a-hit-a24.